Apr
6

Would you pay more for a signed copy?

By Mike Lawson//  News  //  2 Comments

How about $500,000?

According to the New York Times, a rare copy of Jane Austin’s Emma signed by the author sold for more than $500,000.  It was published in 1816 and was one of the 12 copies the publisher gave to Austen to give to friends or family.

All joking aside, would you pay an extra $10 for a book if the author signed the inside cover?

You might also like

Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
I am really glad I made myself read the original Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austin before I picked up...
REVIEW: Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter
When perusing my local bookseller for a fantastic and tasty read, I came across a new release called...
REVIEW: Good Faith by Jane Smiley
If Rex Pickett had written Sideways about real estate instead of wine, you would have Jane Smiley's Good...
Twenties Girl by Sophie Kinsella
Sophie Kinsella follows her tried and true formula for Chic-Lit with a fresh novel, called Twenties Girl....

2 Comments to “Would you pay more for a signed copy?”

  • I would, but only if it was actually signed by the author. I have seen a few books in B&N that were just copies of the autograph. Personally I would prefer to be there when the book is signed. It means more to me that way.

  • No, I woudn’t pay an extra $10 purposefully, but if you buy at Bards Books on 7th and Osborn, they’ll tack in on anyway. I didn’t realize they specifically look for signed copies.

Leave a comment