Apr
6
6
Would you pay more for a signed copy?
How about $500,000?
According to the New York Times, a rare copy of Jane Austin’s Emma signed by the author sold for more than $500,000. It was published in 1816 and was one of the 12 copies the publisher gave to Austen to give to friends or family.
All joking aside, would you pay an extra $10 for a book if the author signed the inside cover?
You might also like
|
|
|
|
|















I would, but only if it was actually signed by the author. I have seen a few books in B&N that were just copies of the autograph. Personally I would prefer to be there when the book is signed. It means more to me that way.
No, I woudn’t pay an extra $10 purposefully, but if you buy at Bards Books on 7th and Osborn, they’ll tack in on anyway. I didn’t realize they specifically look for signed copies.